Between White Settlers and Aboriginals, the Queensland Native Police by Paul DIllon

Between White Settlers and Aboriginals, the Queensland Native Police Paul DIllon Paperback, 140 pages, $39.95 ISBN: 9781923568334 June 2026 release “Paul Dillon, through intense research, surely knows more than any other historian about this topic of significance in Australian history’. - Professor Geoffrey Blainey. The final decade of the 19th century witnessed a recalibration of frontier policy in Cape York Peninsula. The Native Police—long synonymous with violent reprisal—was systematically reconstructed by the government. This historical review analyses the transition from a protective force for white settlers to a "pacific and conciliatory" system for Aboriginal persons. The foundational change was a deliberate move away from the Native Police's traditional role as a retributive, mobile force against Aboriginals. The primary objective was no longer an indiscriminate "move on" policy, but rather a protective, community policing role. The force would now shield Aboriginals from "lawless whites" on the mainland and undesirable Asians on the maritime frontier. The most tangible and practical tool of this new policy was the systematic distribution of rations, the food dole. Flour, beef, and tobacco were provided at police camps and stations. This was a strategic "boon" that fundamentally altered the daily survival of Aboriginal people, thereby encouraging a settled and peaceful proximity to police posts. By providing a reliable food source at fixed locations, travelling and hunting across territories now occupied by settlers were no longer necessary. Thus, the conflict was eliminated. The Native Police now included troopers who spoke local dialects, which was a pragmatic move to improve communication, intelligence gathering, and mediation. The police reported a "pleasantly conspicuous" change in Aboriginal behaviour—a move from hostility and avoidance to a willing engagement with police camps. This transformation proved the system was more effective and humane than the violence it replaced. Do-gooders criticised the system, but their "unreasoning humanitarianism" ignored the practical achievement of saving lives and establishing peace.